Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices Forums Subscribe Archives
Today is April 19, 2014
home news sports feature opinionhappenings society obits techtips

Front Page » February 5, 2002 » Opinion » Letter to the Editor: Monumental Surprise
Published 4,456 days ago

Letter to the Editor: Monumental Surprise


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By GLEN ZUMWALT
Fountain Green

The proposal to create a national monument in Emery County was a surprise to Utahns, especially to Emery County residents who first learned of it on Jan. 26 at a public meeting held in Castle Dale by the county commission and the Emery County Public Lands Council.

Two days later, the governor delivered an even bigger surprise in the state of the state address when he announced the monument proposal would be formally submitted to the president.

What is unsettling is that the governor participated in the Castle Dale public meeting and I, like others attending, clearly heard that this request would not go forward without the support of the people of Emery County.

In spite of the governor's insistence that this is not a "stealth" monument like the Grand Staircase, it smells like stealth to me.

The general public, including organizations representing San Rafael stakeholders, had no knowledge of this monument proposal. I believe this is more like an orchestrated stealth proposal being moved ahead at unbelievable speed with no intent to consider the wishes of the citizens of Utah and the stakeholders of the Swell.

The Antiquities Act provides for protection of historic and scientific objects on federal land allowing designation of only the land necessary for such protection. There is no obvious need to include more than 620,000 acres of land in a monument to preserve relevant historical objects.

It should be important to the commissioners and the governor that any monument request meets the requirements of the Antiquities Act and that the public process truly reflects the desires of the people of Emery County and teh State of Utah. In spite of what has happened in the past, moving ahead as the governor announced ignores proper public input and would set a poor public policy precedent for the Bush administration.

It is hard to understand the need to rush this proposal ahead when the area to be considered is federal land currently protected by the Federal Land Policy Management Act and is subject to a myriad of federal protections, no different than a monument designation would provide.

I believe it is not in the best interests of this state to make such a request before gathering input from its citizens and the users of the Swell.

To request monument status for the Swell before soliciting input from users is a violation of public trust. I sincerely hope neither the Emery County commissioners nor the governor would violate that trust.

Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Web Poll  
April 25, 2011
Do you you think the national deficit that Congress has been struggling with can be better solved by increasing taxes or by cutting spending?
Increasing taxes
(13.11%)
Cutting spending
(57.71%)
Combination of both
(26.08%)
Don't know or don't care
(3.1%)
1549 total votes

Opinion  
February 5, 2002
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Emery County Progress, 2000-2008. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Emery County Progress.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us
z