Classifieds Business Directory Jobs Real Estate Autos Legal Notices Forums Subscribe Archives
Today is July 26, 2014
home news sports feature opinionhappenings society obits techtips

Front Page » January 10, 2006 » Opinion » Letter to the Editor: Golden parachute
Published 3,119 days ago

Letter to the Editor: Golden parachute


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints

By PATSY RUYBAL
Big Water, Utah

Editor,

I am not a political activist. I vote my conscience in all elections hoping that the person elected will best serve the needs of the populace of town, county, state, or country. But recently something came to my attention that I have not been able to put out of my mind and I would like to share my feelings about our federal senators and congressmen.

First of all, these people we elect to represent our interests at the ntational level do not pay into Social Security while in office. They have, however, put into effect a golden parachute for themselves and their spouses when they leave office. It does not matter how many terms they serve, they will collect their pay after they leave office until they die. This amount may be increased from time to time for cost of living adjustments. This retirement plan is paid for out of the general fund and adds an enormous dollar amount to the annual budget of our country.

If one person draws $1,000 monthly in Social Security annuity it would take approximately 68 years to equal what one senator could conceivably draw in one month after leaving office.

I believe the solution to the Social Security dilemma is for the US Senate and US House of Representatives to put their retirement into the Social Security system. If this were to happen not only would they correct the problems in the Social Security system but also they would be more likely to fairly represent the people who put them in office.

People should contact their senators and congressmen and let them know how they feel about this issue and request a reply indicating the official position from each elected representative. Then when election time comes vote those persons out of office who are not willing to equitably represent their constituency. After all these are people who are elected to represent the best interest of the masses, the common people, you and I.


Print PageEmail PageShareGet Reprints


Top of Page


 
Web Poll  
April 25, 2011
Do you you think the national deficit that Congress has been struggling with can be better solved by increasing taxes or by cutting spending?
Increasing taxes
(35.13%)
Cutting spending
(43.28%)
Combination of both
(19.3%)
Don't know or don't care
(2.29%)
2098 total votes

Opinion  
January 10, 2006
Recent Opinion
Quick Links
Subscribe via RSS
Related Articles  
Related Stories



Best viewed with Firefox
Get Firefox

© Emery County Progress, 2000-2008. All rights reserved. All material found on this website, unless otherwise specified, is copyright and may not be reproduced without the explicit written permission from the publisher of the Emery County Progress.
Legal Notices & Terms of Use    Privacy Policy    Advertising Info    FAQ    Contact Us
  RSS Feeds    News on Your Site    Staff Information    Submitting Content    About Us
z